Evidence mapPaperPMID 41257232Full record

ArticleDiabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2025

"Older Adult Diabetes": A Conceptual Proposal for a Distinct Clinical Entity.

Takuya Omura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Takuya OmuraDepartment of Metabolic Research and Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-8653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of diabetes among older adults is steadily rising, especially in aging populations. Although the term "diabetes in older adults" is widely used in clinical guidelines and epidemiological research, it remains largely descriptive, lacking the precision needed to support the development of age-specific treatment strategies. This article proposes the term "older adult diabetes" as a distinct disease entity. By examining the conceptual and linguistic differences between the two terms, the article suggests that the broader adoption of "older adult diabetes" can enhance clinical decision-making, sharpen research focus, and more effectively inform policy development tailored to aging populations.

Identifiers

PMID41257232
PMCPMC12620736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.