Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257659›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Evidence for incentive-based strategies to promote breastfeeding: a systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials.

Elizabeth M Camacho, Kym A Reyes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elizabeth M CamachoInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. elizabeth.camacho@liverpool.ac.uk.
Kym A ReyesSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is some evidence that incentive-based strategies effectively encourage smoking cessation in the perinatal period. Incentives could be part of policies aiming to increase breastfeeding rates. This systematic review aimed to summarise current evidence to guide researchers and policymakers towards potentially effective incentive-based strategies for increasing breastfeeding.

methodsSearches of electronic literature databases were conducted (MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) for evaluations of incentive-based strategies to promote breastfeeding published up to August 2024. Identified studies were screened against pre-specified inclusion criteria: studies focusing on promoting or sustaining breastfeeding; an incentive intervention given to mothers or households; a comparator of standard or usual care or an alternative non-incentive intervention; random allocation to treatment group; evaluation of at least one quantitative outcome measure related to breastfeeding. The following were excluded: literature reviews; conference abstracts; protocol papers; animal studies. Key study information was extracted from included records and they were critically appraised using a published checklist (CASP RCT). The results were presented and synthesised narratively. The review protocol was published on the PROSPERO literature review register.

resultsDatabase searches identified 64 non-duplicate records, and 2 additional records were identified through citation searching of previously published reviews. There were 7 records (from 6 studies) included in the review. Four studies included a total of 260 participants, and the other two studies included a total of 3418 households. Most studies were either conducted in low-income countries (3 of 6) or with low-income mothers in the United States (2 of 6). Some studies reported positive effects of incentives on breastfeeding intention, initiation, prevalence, and duration of exclusive breastfeeding, although others reported neutral findings. Incentives and study designs were heterogeneous, the studies were generally small, and results may not be generalisable to other settings/population groups.

conclusionsThere is some evidence that incentives may improve breastfeeding outcomes, although the quantity and quality of current evidence are both low. Future studies should ensure that sample sizes are sufficiently large and that core breastfeeding outcomes are defined and collected.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth PromotionMotivationFemaleHumansMothersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBreastfeedingIncentiveMilkRewardSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41257659
PMCPMC12628927

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.