Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257667›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2025

Utilization of flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths for the management of 1-2 cm complex lower calyceal calculi.

Zengjun Zhu, Wenyu Chi, Chengrong Zhang, Weihui Jia, Guobao Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zengjun ZhuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No. 2428 Yuhe Road, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261000, China.
Wenyu ChiDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No. 2428 Yuhe Road, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261000, China.
Chengrong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No. 2428 Yuhe Road, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261000, China.
Weihui JiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Weifang People's Hospital, No. 151, Guangwen Street, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261000, China.
Guobao SunDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, No. 2428 Yuhe Road, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261000, China. sgb2071@163.com.

Funding

Weifang Science and Technology Bureau 2024YX047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy (FURL) combined with flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) compared to conventional FURL for treating 1-2 cm complex lower calyceal stones.

methodsA retrospective single-center study was conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Second Medical University, analyzing patients treated between July 2023 and February 2025. Inclusion criteria were: (i) preoperative CT diagnosis of 1-2 cm single lower calyceal stones; (ii) preoperative intravenous urography (IVU) identifying direct insertion of minor calyces into the renal pelvis or branched fusion forming major calyceal openings; and (iii) surgeries performed by one fellowship-trained endourologist for procedural standardization. Exclusion criteria included: (i) uncontrolled preoperative urinary tract infections; (ii) significant ureteral strictures; (iii) severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction or coagulation disorders; (iv) unforeseen postoperative events unrelated to the procedure; and (v) incomplete perioperative data. Patients were divided into an intervention group (FURL with FANS) and a control group (standard FURL with conventional ureteral access sheath). Baseline characteristics, stone-free rates, operative time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared using weighted t-tests, Chi-square tests, or Fisher's exact test.

resultsThe study included 69 patients (intervention group, n = 36; control group, n = 33). After inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW) adjustment, baseline characteristics, including age, sex, BMI, stone size, and stone density, showed no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). The intervention group demonstrated a significantly higher stone-free rate (75.5% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.010), defined as residual fragments < 4 mm on CT at postoperative day 30, shorter operative time (63.02 ± 8.17 min vs. 73.92 ± 15.56 min, P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (3.15 ± 0.46 days vs. 5.16 ± 1.35 days, P < 0.001), and lower incidence of postoperative fever (0% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.047).

conclusionsFURL combined with FANS offers superior efficacy and safety compared to conventional FURL for managing 1-2 cm complex lower calyceal stones. This approach resulted in higher stone-free rates, reduced operative times, shorter hospital stays, and fewer postoperative complications, presenting a promising alternative for this challenging condition. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiKidney CalicesUreteroscopesUreteroscopyAdultAgedEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSuctionTreatment OutcomeFlexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheathsFlexible ureteroscopyLower calyceal stonesMinimally invasive surgeryStone clearance

Identifiers

PMID41257667
PMCPMC12628969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.