SynthesisBMC public health2025
Effectiveness of behavioral intervention programs for preventing and managing diabetes in adults: a systematic review of evidence.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiabetes is a growing global health issue that can have serious consequences. As the value of behavioral intervention programs for preventing and managing this disease in adults becomes more evident, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of these programs in mitigating and managing diabetes among adult populations.
methodsA comprehensive search strategy was employed utilising a range of electronic databases like Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, Medline, PsycINFO, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Only research articles written in English and published between 2012 and 2024 were included. Included were articles focusing on behavioral interventions targeting glycemic control (HbA1c) in adults (≥ 18 years) with or at risk for type 2 diabetes. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, with 39 studies meeting inclusion criteria after screening 1,156 initial records.
resultsThirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, 28 reported significant glycemic improvements, with mean HbA1c reductions of - 0.3% to - 0.7% (Cohen's d ≈ 0.28). Dietary and culturally tailored programs achieved the largest reductions, while CBT and technology-assisted approaches showed modest but clinically relevant effects. Prevention trials reduced diabetes incidence by 20-30% compared with controls.
conclusionBehavioral interventions effectively improve glycemic control and prevent diabetes in at-risk populations. Key components of success include individualized support, multidisciplinary care, and technology integration. These findings underscore the potential of behavioral strategies to complement clinical diabetes management globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.