ArticleScientific reports2025
Prospective characterization of clonal hematopoiesis and its clinical associations in elderly patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone health in myelodysplastic neoplasms: results from the prospective longitudinal BoHemE study.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and Cardiometabolic Disease: Challenges, Controversies and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is characterized by the expansion of hematopoietic stem cell clones carrying somatic mutations that confer a proliferative advantage, encompassing conditions such as Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) and Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance (CCUS), each with varying clinical implications. This prospective 8-year cohort study of 173 patients investigated the prevalence, clinical outcomes, and genetic evolution of CHIP and CCUS in individuals over 75 years of age without prior hematologic disease, analyzing mortality rates, changes in allelic frequency over time, clinical characteristics, and associations with comorbidities such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Through next-generation sequencing of 173 patients, we identified a 30.6% prevalence of CH, with DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 as the most frequently mutated genes. While no significant associations were found between CH and cardiovascular disease or overall cytopenias, CH was correlated with a higher prevalence of osteoporosis, and high-risk CH was associated with cytopenias. Although not statistically significant (p = 0.09), survival curves suggested a potential trend toward higher mortality among patients with clonal hematopoiesis, supporting the need for further investigation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.