ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Pharmacist follow-up of patients prescribed nirmatrelvir/ritonavir: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r), a drug used to treat coronavirus disease 2019, has raised concerns about potential drug-drug interactions with concomitant medications due to cytochrome P450 3 A inhibition. However, limited data exist on its use alongside concomitant medications in clinical practice. METHODS AND
resultsIn this study, we conducted a retrospective survey using electronic medical records of 32 outpatients whose physicians instructed them to temporarily withdraw some of their regular medications. Medication status and adherence with instructions for the temporary withdrawal of concomitant medications were assessed via telephone. The results showed that three of the 32 patients (9%) took NMV/r contrary to their physician’s instructions, two of whom misused the dosage and one who self-interrupted the treatment. Additionally, 16 patients (50%) did not follow instructions to discontinue their regular medication. Beyond NMV/r adherence, potential post-prescription issues were identified, such as forgetting to resume regular medications or discontinuing medications at the patient’s discretion.
conclusionPost-prescription pharmacist follow-ups may improve adherence to NMV/r and support the safe management of regular medications. Future studies are needed to optimize NMV/r use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.