Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41258153›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2025

The chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systems.

Yu-Chieh Cheng, Margret Krieger, Anna-Maria Korves, Amélia Camarinha-Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu-Chieh ChengUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Science, Stuttgart, Germany.
Margret KriegerDepartment of Animal Nutrition and Animal Health, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen, Germany.
Anna-Maria KorvesDepartment Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany.
Amélia Camarinha-SilvaUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Animal Science, Stuttgart, Germany. amelia.silva@uni-hohenheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7814-6569

Funding

Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft FKZ 2821OE034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry gut microbiome plays a key role in nutrient digestion, immune function, and overall health. Differences among various farming systems, including conventional, antibiotic-free, free-range, and organic systems, influence microbial composition and function through variations in diet, genetic selection, environmental exposure, and antibiotic use. Conventional systems typically rely on formulated diets and controlled housing conditions, often with routine antimicrobial use. In contrast, organic systems emphasize natural feed ingredients, including roughage, outdoor access, and strict limitations on the use of antibiotics. These divergent practices shape the gut microbiota differently, with organic systems generally associated with greater exposure to environmental microbes and, consequently, greater microbial diversity. However, the implications of this increased diversity for poultry health and performance are complex, as organic systems may also carry a higher risk of pathogen exposure. This review summarizes current findings on the chicken gut microbiome across conventional and alternative production systems (antibiotic-free, free-range, and organic), focusing on microbial diversity, functional potential, and disease resilience. The need for standardized methodologies and consistent nomenclature in microbiome research is also discussed to improve comparability across studies. Understanding how production systems influence the gut microbiota is essential for improving poultry health and productivity while addressing challenges related to antimicrobial resistance and sustainable farming practices.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceChickenGut microbiomeOrganicProduction systems

Identifiers

PMID41258153
PMCPMC12628858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.