ArticleBMC global and public health2025
Evaluating the implementation of Bulamu healthcare's maternal and newborn program in Uganda.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal and newborn mortality remain critical challenges in Uganda, with rates exceeding global targets. Despite the existence of effective clinical guidelines, such as the World Health Organization's (WHO) Essential Newborn Care (ENC) and Helping Mothers Survive (HMS), implementation gaps persist due to training, resource, and systems-level barriers. Bulamu Healthcare launched a comprehensive maternal and newborn care capacity-strengthening program across eight districts in Uganda to improve clinical outcomes and health system performance. This model works with 104 existing public maternity facilities, which delivered more than 77,000 babies in 2024, and served more than 154,000 mothers and newborns in 2024.
methodsThis retrospective evaluation assessed the implementation of Bulamu's maternal and newborn health model using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). The program included clinical training (WHO ENC, HMS) and mentorship, provision of essential supplies, and data-driven quality improvement. Data were collected from Uganda's national District Health Information Software (DHIS2) and Bulamu program monitoring tools from January 2023 to March 2025. Descriptive statistics summarized key implementation and outcome indicators.
resultsBulamu supported 109 health facilities, exceeding the initial target of 79, and established 12 functional neonatal care units (Reach). All facilities received the full intervention package. Over 250 maternity workers were trained, and 100% of district health workers in supported areas received ENC training (Feasibility). Live births in Bulamu facilities increased by 14% from 2023 to 2024, while maternal deaths decreased by 59% (from 17 to 7) (Effectiveness). The proportion of low-birth-weight newborns receiving kangaroo mother care rose from 54 to 62%, and newborn discharged alive rates improved from 80% to 96.4% (Effectiveness). Facilities demonstrated early signs of sustainability, with at least one trained maternal and newborn provider retained per site and local staff beginning to independently train peers.
conclusionsBulamu's integrated approach combining evidence-based interventions with targeted systems support improved care delivery and maternal-newborn outcomes in Bulamu-supported health facilities. Findings highlight the utility of the RE-AIM framework for real-world evaluation and support the value of embedded implementation research in strengthening health systems. Future research should examine cost-effectiveness, sustainability, and context-specific implementation mechanisms to inform scale-up and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.