ArticleScientific reports2025
Motor engagement, physical activity intensity, and enjoyment in pre-school children during different game-based formats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare two small and adjusted game formats (1v1 and 2v2) in basketball and soccer, focusing on preschool children's motor engagement, physical activity (PA) levels, and self-reported enjoyment across multiple sessions. A within-subjects repeated-measures design was used, involving 26 male preschool children (5.7 ± 0.5 years old). In the basketball and soccer sessions, children played games targeting small goals (soccer) and lowered hoops represented by floor circles (basketball). During gameplay, participants wore accelerometers to measure physical activity levels, and trained observers recorded motor engagement using the Observational System for Recording Physical Activity in Children - Preschool Version (OSRAC-P). After each session, children rated their enjoyment using a validated preschool visual analog scale designed for real-time assessment of young children's enjoyment of physical activity. Results revealed significant effects of format on light (p = 0.012, d = 0.53) and vigorous PA (p < 0.001, d = 1.25), with 2v2 promoting more light PA and 1v1 provoking more vigorous PA. Sport type significantly influenced moderate PA (p = 0.007, d = 0.58), with soccer showing higher values than basketball. Motor engagement differed by condition; slow-easy movements were most frequent in 2v2 soccer (r = 0.56), while fast movements were highest in 1v1 formats (r ≥ 0.52). Regarding enjoyment, 2v2 basketball consistently elicited greater scores across all dimensions-attraction (r = 0.59), preference (r = 0.63), environment (r = 0.69), and social engagement (r = 0.66)-compared to 1v1 soccer and basketball. In conclusion, the findings suggest that while more individual formats of play may support motor engagement and physical activity levels, games involving teammates and hand-based interaction may be more enjoyable for male preschoolers in short-term settings. Further studies are needed to determine whether these patterns extend to girls and to longer-term interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.