Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259025›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Family Caregiver Experiences Coordinating Care of Older Adults.

Jennifer L Wolff, Chanee D Fabius, M J Wu, Vicki A Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Friend Caregivers Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer L WolffDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chanee D FabiusDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
M J WuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Vicki A FreedmanInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Trends and Dynamics in Caregiving for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias: Extending the National Study of CaregivingR01AG062477 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FREEDMAN, VICKI A., WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2019 to 2023
$10.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults with disabilities rely on support from family caregivers, medical professionals, and paid caregivers. Unlike team-based interprofessional care, coordination of care work is not protocolized or well understood. Objective: To describe family caregiver experiences coordinating care with medical professionals, other family caregivers, and paid caregivers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional analysis of the 2023 National Health and Aging Trends Study and the linked National Study of Caregiving included data on 2811 family and unpaid caregivers to community-living adults aged 65 years or older with disabilities. Exposure: Caregiver characteristics, caregiving circumstances, negative consequences, supportive services use, and, for medical professionals, frequency of interactions and types of communication behaviors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adapted relational coordination index (RCI; range, 1-5; greater values indicate higher relational coordination) reflecting frequency of any communication and problem-solving communication, as well as shared goals, shared knowledge, and mutual respect with medical professionals, paid caregivers, and other family caregivers. Results: Among a weighted sample of 2811 family and unpaid caregivers (1633 women [63.4%]; 1044 aged ≥65 years [41.5%]), most (2448 [87.6%]) engaged in care work that involved medical professionals (2061 [76.4%]), other family caregivers (1791 [62.8%]), or paid caregivers (822 [23.2%]). Relational coordination was reported to be weak with medical professionals (RCI, 3.10 [95% CI, 3.03-3.16]) and moderate for paid caregivers (RCI, 3.80 [95% CI, 3.71-3.89]) and other family caregivers (RCI, 4.20 [95% CI, 4.13-4.27]). Across all roles, relational coordination was higher when caregivers were related to the older adult, assisted an older adult with greater care needs, and engaged in higher-intensity caregiving. Use of supportive services was associated with higher relational coordination with medical professionals and paid caregivers but varied in magnitude by service type; the greatest differential was observed for family caregivers who did (vs did not) receive training when reflecting on medical professionals (3.63 [95% CI, 3.42-3.83] vs 3.05 [95% CI, 2.99-3.12]; P < .001). The RCI fluctuated from 2.33 [95% CI, 2.24-2.42] among caregivers who never interacted with medical professionals to 4.21 [95% CI, 4.11-4.31] among caregivers who interacted with medical professionals often and were always or usually asked about needed help. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of a national survey found that few family caregivers engage in care work alone. Further study is needed to determine if weak relational coordination with medical professionals may be remediated through training and supportive communication.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyPersons with DisabilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41259025
PMCPMC12631485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.