ArticlePloS one2025
Safety assessment of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and comparison of time to adverse events.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the risk of adverse drug events from combining aromatase inhibitors with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS and JADER databases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultiple CDK4/6 inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of HR + /HER2- advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, there is currently a scarcity of safety reports on CDK4/6 inhibitors within large sample cohorts.
methodsWe employed a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database to detect safety signals for the three marketed CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib). We retrieved pertinent reports from 2004 Q1 to 2023 Q3. Four asymmetric analyses were utilized to assess signals.
resultsA total of 459 positive signals were obtained at the preferred term level (146 positive signals for palbociclib, 68 positive signals for abemaciclib, 245 positive signals for ribociclib). Palbociclib-related adverse events were commonly fatigue, white blood cell count decreased, alopecia. Abemaciclib-related adverse events were commonly diarrhea, decreased appetite, dehydration. Ribociclib-related adverse events were commonly neutropenia, white blood cell count decreased and decreased immune responsiveness. Unexpected adverse events related to palbociclib included hot flush, bone marrow failure. Unexpected adverse events related to abemaciclib included myelosuppression, dehydration, and cystatin C increased. Unexpected adverse events related to ribociclib included decreased immune responsiveness, pleural effusion, atrioventricular conduction time shortened.
conclusionOur research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to CDK4/6 inhibitors while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.