ArticlePloS one2025
Functional characterization of a bovine luteal cell culture model: Effects of passage number.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving Cattle GWAS Loci: Current Progress, Persistent Challenges and Future Directions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Establishment and characterization of an immortalized bovine luteal cell line.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary cell culture models are useful tools to analyze intracellular signaling pathways and interactions in detail. However, at higher passages, vital cell characteristics such as cell morphology, physiology, gene expression and cell proliferation can be compromised which may result in variable data. In the present study, we characterized cultured primary luteal cells (PLCs) and compared them to intermediate passaged luteal cells i.e. passage number 15 (P15) and high passaged luteal cells i.e. passage number 30 (P30). To explore in-vitro culture induced variabilities, PLCs were passaged repeatedly until passage number P30. Expression of cell cytoskeleton proteins was monitored by immunofluorescence and steroidogenic acute regulatory (STAR) protein expression was detected by capillary electrophoresis as physiological key parameter. The abundance of STAR, hydroxy-delta-5-steroid dehydrogenase, 3 beta- and steroid delta-isomerase 1 (HSD3B1) and luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) marker transcripts was quantified by RT-qPCR. Cell proliferation and cell viability of luteal cells were evaluated using flow cytometry. Global gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing was performed on early passaged (P3) luteal cells. Cell passaging severely reduced the expression of genes encoding marker proteins of luteal cells. Similarly, progesterone (P4) synthesis and cell proliferation were reduced significantly at higher passages. Early passaged (P3) luteal cells expressed key genes of luteal cells but with lower expression values. Luteal cells remained highly viable and consistently co-expressed both vimentin and cytokeratin-18 protein in their cytoskeleton irrespective of passage number. Together, these findings demonstrate that only short-term luteal cell primary cultures or very early passaged luteal cells (P3) are able to display molecular features that resemble that of the corpus luteum in vivo and thus are suitable in vitro models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.