ArticlePloS one2025
Birth weight discordance, gene expression, and DNA methylation: A scoping review of epigenetic twin studies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilization of genetic biomarkers for childhood stunting surveillance and early detection in Southeast Asia: a systematic review.Annals of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBirth weight is considered as an important indicator of environmental conditions during prenatal development. Molecular mechanisms, including epigenetic modifications, play central roles in the body's adaptation to ever-changing environmental conditions. Twin study designs offer a powerful approach for distinguishing environmental from genetic effects. Specifically, within-pair comparisons of monozygotic twins can be used to differentiate unique individual environmental factors from shared environmental and genetic contributions. Notably, numerous studies in monozygotic twins have shown associations between prenatal environment and birth weight discordance (BWD), and suggested a potential involvement of gene expression and epigenetic factors mediating the association.
objectiveTo conduct a scoping review of the literature on definitions of BWD and on epigenetic modifications and gene expression changes associated with BWD in twins.
methodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE(R) databases and included 34 twin studies focusing on birth weight and epigenetic or gene expression outcomes.
resultsThere is a lack of consensus on BWD values when comparing groups of twins for their risks of perinatal mortality and morbidity, which vary between 15-30% depending on the type of placentation and gestational age. The gene expression twin studies measured mostly metabolism-related candidate genes in placental tissues. Only small-scale twin studies measured BWD associated with gene expression patterns on genome-wide level using neonatal cells. Most DNA methylation twin studies conducted epigenome-level analyses, and studies differ substantially in terms of tissue type and age of the children. Differences in DNA methylation patterns measured in blood or saliva samples of the twins later in life were mostly in genes related to signal transduction, cell differentiation and proliferation processes.
conclusionTranscriptional changes of placental glucose transporters and hypoxia-induced proteins possibly reflect compensatory processes in twin pregnancies. Gene ontology analysis of the differentially methylated genes associated with BWD pointed to transcription regulation and tissue development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.