ArticleNoise & health
Impact of Postoperative Noise Reduction on Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep Quality in Patients with Extensive Burns Undergoing Skin Grafting.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative noise control on anxiety, depression, and sleep quality in patients with extensive burns undergoing skin grafting.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 148 patients with burns (May 2022-December 2024), including 73 in the regular group (standard care) and 75 in the noise control group (noise-reducing caring method). Outcomes included noise levels, emotional states [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)], sleep quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)], Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), wound healing, and nursing satisfaction.
resultsFollowing the caring method, the noise reduction group showed significantly lower HAMD scores (13.25 ± 1.10 vs. 17.73 ± 2.01, P < 0.001) and HAMA scores (12.50 ± 1.60 vs. 16.49 ± 1.32, P < 0.001) compared with the regular group. The PSQI scores were significantly lower in the noise reduction group (4.55 ± 1.02 vs. 7.16 ± 1.24, P < 0.001). The daytime and nighttime ward noise levels in the noise reduction group were 42.15 ± 3.28 and 32.47 ± 2.91 dB, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the regular group (50.62 ± 4.11 and 40.85 ± 3.74 dB, respectively, P < 0.001). Additionally, the noise reduction group had a higher skin graft survival rate (78.25% vs. 72.48%, P = 0.023), shorter graft survival time (26.85 ± 2.12 vs. 30.12 ± 2.56 days, P < 0.001), and higher nursing satisfaction (94.67% vs. 80.82%, P = 0.010).
conclusionPostoperative noise control improves psychological status, sleep quality, and wound healing, warranting clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.