Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261080›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

Examining changes in the prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021-2024.

Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Colin Angus, Abi Stevely, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Leonie Brose, Luke Wilson, John Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5658-6168
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5428
Colin AngusSPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Abi StevelySheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Magdalena Opazo BretonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-7541
Leonie BroseAddictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-6854
Luke WilsonSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
John HolmesSPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-2151

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR156679National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)School for Public Health Research (SPHR) NIHR204000UK Prevention Research Partnership MR/S037519/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAffordability of alcohol is a key driver of consumption. The cost-of-living crisis in Great Britain has been putting pressure on household budgets since late 2021. In addition, the UK Government implemented substantial reforms to the alcohol duty system and increased alcohol taxes in 2023. This study aimed to estimate changes in the monthly prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers over this period.

designData were drawn from the Alcohol Toolkit Study, a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional household survey.

settingGreat Britain.

participants26 212 risky drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test - consumption (AUDIT-C) score ≥5] aged ≥18y surveyed between January 2021 and December 2024 [mean (SD) age = 45.9 (17.1); 61.4% men]. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was having tried to reduce alcohol consumption in the past year due to a decision that drinking was too expensive ('cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt'). This included participants who also reported other motives (e.g. health concerns) for trying to reduce their consumption.

findingsOverall, 1355 participants reported making a cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempt. The monthly weighted prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers increased from 4.6% in January 2021 to 7.0% in December 2024 [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34-1.74]; equating to ~1.1 million people attempting to reduce their drinking among risky drinkers in 2024. This was primarily driven by a rise in the proportion of all alcohol reduction attempts that were motivated by cost, from 12.4% to 19.7% (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.39-1.77), rather than an overall increase in the prevalence of alcohol reduction attempts (which remained relatively stable across the period at an average of 36.0%). The pattern of results was similar when the outcome was restricted to alcohol reduction attempts only motivated by cost [17.3% (95% CI = 15.0-19.7%) of all cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts].

conclusionsDuring a period of increasing financial pressures in Great Britain, alcohol reduction attempts were increasingly motivated by cost but the overall prevalence of reduction attempts did not increase.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic BeveragesMotivationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceTaxesUnited KingdomYoung Adultalcohol consumptionalcohol dutyalcohol reduction attemptsalcohol taxcost‐of‐living crisisincreasing and higher risk drinking

Identifiers

PMID41261080
PMCPMC12980291

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.