ArticleDiabetologia2026
Redosing of anti-CD3 antibodies in NOD mice with new-onset diabetes does not alter the effect of a single treatment course.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- GLP1-E2 therapy delays autoimmune diabetes in late-stage prediabetic NOD mice and potentiates low-dose anti-CD3 therapy for enhanced disease protection.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- CD38 defines a therapeutically targetable pathogenic T cell population for precision immunotherapy in autoimmune diabetes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisUncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of redosing teplizumab, a humanised anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, in individuals with stage 2 and 3 type 1 diabetes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of redosing an anti-CD3 antibody on disease reversal and immune responses in NOD mice.
methodsNew-onset diabetic NOD mice were treated with a short course (days 0-4) of low-dose anti-CD3 (2.5 µg/day i.v.), followed by a second treatment course administered either early (days 14-18) or late (days 43-47) following the initial course. Diabetes outcomes, anti-drug antibody titres, inflammatory markers and the profiles of peripheral blood and pancreatic immune cells were assessed.
resultsA single course of anti-CD3 therapy reversed type 1 diabetes in 17 out of 40 treated mice (43%). However, neither early nor late redosing improved therapeutic outcomes in non-responder mice or disrupted re-established tolerance in responder mice. Early redosing, administered at the time of CD3⁺ T cell repopulation, and late redosing, timed when anti-drug antibody titres declined after their peak at 14 days, failed to induce remission in non-responder mice (0/10 and 0/5, respectively). Importantly, redosing did not trigger relapse in mice that had achieved remission following the initial treatment course, with all remaining normoglycaemic (5/5 with early redosing; 23/23 with late redosing). Inflammatory markers increased transiently, regardless of treatment response or regimen. In the pancreas, responder mice had a pronounced shift from an effector (CD62L⁻CD44⁺) to a naive (CD62L⁺CD44⁻) phenotype in both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, independent of treatment regimen, indicative of a more regulated immune environment. These mice also exhibited elevated frequencies of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells with an exhausted (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1]⁺killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G, member 1 [KLRG1]⁺) profile in their pancreas, a trait not observed in non-responder mice. Furthermore, the proportion of natural killer (NK) (NKp46⁺CD3⁻) cells was enriched in the pancreas of non-responder mice. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThese findings suggest that while a single course of anti-CD3 therapy can be effective in a subset of mice, redosing does not enhance efficacy yet is well tolerated in previously reversed mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.