ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Insights into PET-Microplastics effect on pathogenic bacteria.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Frontiers in CRISPR-Based Strategies for the Detection and Degradation of Microplastics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microbial remediation of PAHs in aquatic environments: advances, ssynergistic mechanisms, and emerging strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing environmental and health concerns related to microplastics (MPs) exposure have prompted increasing attention, yet the toxicological impacts of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics (PET-MPs) remain poorly understood. This study investigated the dose-dependent physiological and antimicrobial susceptibility responses of four pathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhimurium, and Staphylococcus aureus) to PET-MPs exposure. The results revealed species- and dose-dependent responses. E. coli and P. aeruginosa exhibited a consistent stimulatory effect on growth and biomass with increasing PET-MPs concentrations, whereas S. aureus and S. typhimurium displayed biphasic behavior with growth inhibition at lower concentrations and significant stimulation at higher levels. Furthermore, protein disruption and upregulation of catalase (CAT) activity were observed in all bacterial strains across the tested concentrations. Notably, bacteria acclimated to 3% PET-MPs exhibited enhanced resistance to multiple antibiotics, indicating adaptive cellular mechanisms promoting multidrug resistance. Microscopic examination of the DNA extraction solutions revealed particles with a morphology consistent with PET-MPs; however, definitive molecular associations between MPs and genomic DNA require confirmation through advanced co-localization analyses. Overall, these findings offer new insights into the biological and adaptive responses of pathogenic bacteria to exposure to microplastics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41261281What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.