Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261414›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2025

A comparative analysis of structural equation modeling and traditional regression analysis in investigating factors affecting health-related quality of life in general Thai population.

Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul, Apinya Ingard

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Krittaphas KangwanrattanakulDivision of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Burapha University, 169 Long-Hard Bangsaen Rd., Mueang, Chonburi, 20131, Thailand. krittaphas@buu.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-8508
Apinya IngardDepartment of Digital Technology for Business, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Silpakorn University, City Campus (Muang Thong Thani), 80 Popular Road, Banmai, Pakkret, Nonthaburi, 11120, Thailand.

Funding

the Research Grant of Burapha University through National Research Council of Thailand Grant No. Rx6/2566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies identified individual characteristics as factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores. Nevertheless, most studies employed univariate or multiple regression analyses, which have limitations in handling confounding variables and measurement errors across multiple dependent variables. This study therefore aimed to assess psychometric properties, investigate factors affecting HRQoL using the World Health Organization Quality of Life — Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) and the EuroQol five-dimension, five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) among general Thai population using structural equation modelling (SEM) and to compare the results with the traditional regression analyses.

methodsThe study utilized secondary data from the 2023 Thai population norms survey. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 2,000 adults. However, SEM analysis was performed on data from 1,927 participants, after excluding 73 individuals to meet the assumption of normality. The study adapted Ferran’s model to fit the available data and evaluated measurement properties (i.e., internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity). It also employed partial least squares SEM (PLS-SEM) to examine structural relationships and model properties through predictive relevance (Q2), effect size (f2), and goodness of fitness (GOF).

resultsAge significantly impacted WHOQOL-BREF scores (β = [Formula: see text]0.264, f2 = 0.037). For EQ-5D-5L, age (β = [Formula: see text]0.304, f2 = 0.071), occupation (β = [Formula: see text]0.422, f2 = 0.036), and drug (β = [Formula: see text]0.288, f2 = 0.052) were key factors. However, traditional regression yielded different results for drug and occupation factors on WHOQOL-BREF and MCS scores. General health perception was the strongest predictor of HRQoL for both models exhibiting acceptable reliability and validity. For most dependent variables explained by the model, predictive power was medium to large, except for the mental component summary, which displayed a small predictive value (Q² = 0.115). Both models demonstrated a high fit (GOF: 0.539 and 0.521 for WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D-5L, respectively).

conclusionsDifferent statistical approaches yield varying results as SEM indicates that age, occupation, and drug significantly influence HRQoL scores, whereas traditional regression finds no significant effects for drug and occupation. Nevertheless, these findings can guide policymakers in allocating resources to targeting population groups with low levels of HRQoL.

Indexed as

Health StatusLatent Class AnalysisQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultAdapted Ferran’s modelEQ-5D-5LHealth-related quality of lifeStructural equation modelingThai populationTraditional regression analysisWHOQOL-BREF

Identifiers

PMID41261414
PMCPMC12632073

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.