ReviewHaematologica2026
JAK inhibitor selection in challenging scenarios of myelofibrosis: a review.
Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Molecularly Targeted Therapies in Oncology: Mechanisms, Resistance, and Combination Strategies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Intricate Dance Between Inflammation and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: From Origins to Outcomes.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Roginolisib in Combination with JAK Inhibitors in Patients with Myelofibrosis Who are Unresponsive to Approved JAK Inhibitors (Study HEMA-MED) - A Trial in Progress.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myelofibrosis is a progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling. Common clinical manifestations include constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, and anemia, which can significantly impact quality of life and survival. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only curative treatment modality in myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors have transformed management by providing symptom relief and reducing spleen size in many patients; newer JAK inhibitors also offer anemia-related benefits. Four JAK inhibitors - ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib - are now available for the treatment of myelofibrosis, each with distinct profiles and safety considerations that may inform selection. However, head-to-head trial comparisons are limited, and real-world experience with most of these JAK inhibitors is only just emerging; therefore, first-line selection and optimal sequencing in particular patients can be challenging. This review summarizes the current data surrounding available JAK inhibitors for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and examines how individual patients' characteristics can help guide selection among them. To illustrate the diverse clinical factors and key considerations associated with JAK inhibitor selection in practice, we discuss these data in the context of four hypothetical cases representing possible real-world scenarios, offering treatment recommendations based on our collective expertise in the field. As the myelofibrosis therapeutic landscape continues to evolve, a thorough understanding of the strengths and limitations of each JAK inhibitor relative to a given patient's presentation will support individualized treatment decisions for optimal long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.