Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262043›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2026

JAK inhibitor selection in challenging scenarios of myelofibrosis: a review.

Pankit Vachhani, Ruben Mesa, John Mascarenhas, Raajit Rampal, Stephen T Oh, Alessandro Maria Vannucchi, Maria Laura Fox, Francesca Palandri, Francesco Passamonti, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pankit VachhaniDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL. pvachhani@uabmc.edu.
Ruben MesaLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
John MascarenhasTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Raajit RampalDepartment of Medicine, Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Stephen T OhDivision of Hematology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Alessandro Maria VannucchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence and Careggi Hospital, Florence.
Maria Laura FoxDepartment of Hematology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesca PalandriDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli," Bologna.
Francesco PassamontiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan.
Jean-Jacques KiladjianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Paris Cité University, INSERM, Paris.
Mahshid AzimiGSK plc, Philadelphia, PA.
Claire HarrisonDepartment of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London.
Prithviraj BoseLeukemia Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tissue BankP01CA108671 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Ross L Levine · 2006 to 2026
$82.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA108671NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelofibrosis is a progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by dysregulated Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling. Common clinical manifestations include constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, and anemia, which can significantly impact quality of life and survival. Although hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only curative treatment modality in myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors have transformed management by providing symptom relief and reducing spleen size in many patients; newer JAK inhibitors also offer anemia-related benefits. Four JAK inhibitors - ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib - are now available for the treatment of myelofibrosis, each with distinct profiles and safety considerations that may inform selection. However, head-to-head trial comparisons are limited, and real-world experience with most of these JAK inhibitors is only just emerging; therefore, first-line selection and optimal sequencing in particular patients can be challenging. This review summarizes the current data surrounding available JAK inhibitors for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and examines how individual patients' characteristics can help guide selection among them. To illustrate the diverse clinical factors and key considerations associated with JAK inhibitor selection in practice, we discuss these data in the context of four hypothetical cases representing possible real-world scenarios, offering treatment recommendations based on our collective expertise in the field. As the myelofibrosis therapeutic landscape continues to evolve, a thorough understanding of the strengths and limitations of each JAK inhibitor relative to a given patient's presentation will support individualized treatment decisions for optimal long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Janus Kinase InhibitorsPrimary MyelofibrosisHumansJanus KinasesJanus Kinase InhibitorsJanus Kinases

Identifiers

PMID41262043
PMCPMC13040198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.