Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262383›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Enhancing benefit finding and psychological well-being in depression care: a quasi-experimental study of group psychoeducation in Chinese adults.

Xin Lu, Yu Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin LuAdult Psychiatric Male Ward, Hunan Second People's Hospital (Hunan Brain Hospital), Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yu XiaoDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Hunan Brain Hospital), Changsha, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability globally and is often accompanied by emotional and cognitive impairments that limit individuals' ability to perceive positive aspects of life. Within the framework of health psychology and the biopsychosocial model, meaning-based interventions such as group psychoeducation may help enhance protective psychological resources like benefit finding and overall well-being. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a structured psychoeducational group intervention in improving benefit finding, psychological well-being, and depressive symptoms among Chinese adults with MDD in a real-world clinical context. Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test design with a control group was used. A total of 114 adults diagnosed with MDD were allocated to either an intervention groups ( Results: The intervention group showed significant increase in benefit finding, with mean scores rising from 57.12 ± 9.48 at pre-test to 83.33 ± 9.19 at post-test ( Conclusion: This study supports the integration of health psychology principles into mental health care by demonstrating that group psychoeducational interventions can effectively enhance benefit finding in individuals with depression, especially in collectivistic cultural contexts. However, longer or more intensive interventions may be required to observe broader improvements in psychological well-being and symptom reduction.

Indexed as

benefit findingdepressioninterventionmental healthwell-being

Identifiers

PMID41262383
PMCPMC12623310

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.