ArticleBrain communications2025
Long-term fixation impact on archived human nervous tissues for sequencing-based transcriptomics.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutation-specific neuropathologic signatures in MAPT-associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- A Field-Friendly, Non-Toxic Fixative for Integrated Morphological and Molecular Research in Non-Model Invertebrates.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomics in Alzheimer's disease: technologies, challenges and discoveries.Molecular neurodegeneration advances · 2026Review
- Antibody elution methods for multiplex immunofluorescence of Alzheimer's disease pathology in human post-mortem brain tissue.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of transcriptomics technologies compatible with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues has enabled greater opportunities for scientists to interrogate the transcriptome of archived tissues, especially those from rare neurodegenerative diseases. Tissues from brain banks are often placed in fixative for weeks or years due to limitations in resources and storage space. We investigated the impact of long-term fixation for sequencing-based transcriptomics in human formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lumbar spinal cord and hypothalamic tissues sourced from the Sydney Brain Bank. Extended fixation times were not associated with RNA quality metrics, RNA integrity number or DV200. However, fixation duration was associated with poorer ligation of transcriptome probes, leading to poorer detection of RNA molecules. This led to lower measured central nervous system gene expression, severely impacting the interpretability of the transcriptome. The findings of this study underscore the importance of adaptability and standardization among brain banks, especially in the face of rapid technological advancements. There is a need to foster collaborative efforts between researchers, technology providers and brain banks worldwide to ensure tissue compatibility with emerging technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.