ReviewNanotechnology, science and applications2025
Mechanisms and Research Progress of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Modulating Neural Plasticity for Neuroregeneration.
Review in Nanotechnology, science and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Superparamagnetic Biomembranes for Dynamic Nanoparticle and Molecular Patterning.Nano letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), particularly those exhibiting superparamagnetism and biocompatibility, have garnered significant interest in the biomedical field due to their unique physicochemical properties. Recent studies have shown that MNPs can modulate neural plasticity by influencing key signaling pathways such as BDNF (Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor) and the PI3K/Akt pathway, critical for neuronal growth, synaptic connectivity, and functional recovery. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms through which MNPs interact with neural tissues, highlighting the diversity of nanoparticle types (eg, iron oxide, gold, and carbon-based nanoparticles) and their applications in neurodegenerative disease treatment and neural regeneration. Despite the immense potential of MNPs in neurodegenerative disease treatment, this review also compares them with traditional interventions, discussing their advantages and limitations. Additionally, it addresses key challenges, particularly the difficulty of overcoming the blood-brain barrier, and issues related to biocompatibility, toxicity, and long-term safety. In clinical applications, ethical concerns, such as patient informed consent and long-term risks, must also be considered alongside efficacy and safety. This review offers insights into these challenges and provides a framework for future research, aiming to accelerate the clinical integration of MNP-based neurotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.