Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263254›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Honeybees express foodward flight vectors after a detour.

Anna Hadjitofi, Marie Messerich, Tim Landgraf, Barbara Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna HadjitofiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7515-0295
Marie MesserichDahlem Center for Machine Learning and Robotics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-4948-5616
Tim LandgrafDahlem Center for Machine Learning and Robotics, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-5235
Barbara WebbSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8336-6926

Funding

European Research Council 817535-UltimateCOMPASSEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 824069Eva Crane Trust ECTA_20221208Janet Foreman Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honeybee waggle dance communicates a flight vector to a food source, but it is challenging to isolate how precisely dancers and recruits can navigate using this vector information independently of environmental cues. We introduce an enforced-detour paradigm, using tunnels, to quantify the initial flight vectors expressed by experienced foragers and new recruits en route to the food. Upon exiting the detour, bees exhibit immediate corrective turns consistent with using path integration to fly towards the food's virtual location. While the populations' flight bearings after the turn are correctly centred on the food, the bearings of individuals are considerably scattered around it. We further show that recruits' bearings can be predicted by observing their mechanical sensory experiences during dance following. Our findings suggest that the communicated or recalled vector can be combined with path integration to take corrective shortcuts, but also that the vector provides an approximate location rather than pinpoint accuracy.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAppetitive BehaviorBeesFlight, AnimalAnimalsCuesDetour experimentHoneybeesVector navigationWaggle dance

Identifiers

PMID41263254
PMCPMC12669837

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.