ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2026
Constructing targeted minimum loss/maximum likelihood estimators: a simple illustration to build intuition.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulling back the curtain: the road from statistical estimand to machine-learning-based estimator for epidemiologists (no wizard required).American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning is increasingly used to estimate nuisance functions in causal inference. The efficient influence function (EIF) offers a principled way to construct estimators that can incorporate machine learning with valid inference (eg, estimate valid conference intervals). In this tutorial, we illustrate how to construct targeted maximum likelihood/minimum loss estimators from the EIF, a topic that is well covered in statistical literature but remains less accessible to applied researchers. A companion paper, Renson et al. 2025 (AJE, kwaf169) provides a thorough, but approachable description of the EIF and its derivation for a statistical estimand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.