SynthesisJournal of immigrant and minority health2026
Diabetes Self-Care among South Asians in Western Countries: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes self-care is a patient-driven approach to managing diabetes, supported by healthcare professionals, that aims to empower patients to reduce long-term complications associated with the disease. This is particularly important for South Asians, who are among the populations most affected by diabetes. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesises both qualitative and quantitative evidence on diabetes self-care among South Asians living in Western countries and presents an integrated framework covering key areas for optimal self-care. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO. Seven databases were searched for both qualitative and quantitative studies published between January 2000 and December 2024 to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evidence. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for quality assessment and the Risk of Bias V2 tool for trials were utilised, with data integrated through the Pillar Integration Process (PIP). Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into this review. Most qualitative, cohort, and cross-sectional studies met over 70% of quality criteria, and all four randomised controlled trials demonstrated a low risk of bias. Qualitative findings highlighted the significance of culturally relevant education and support, while quantitative studies showed improvements in diabetes outcomes through educational and physical activity interventions. Common barriers included difficulties with self-monitoring, adherence to dietary guidelines, and implementing lifestyle changes. The PIP analysis identified three core pillars: providing adequate diabetes education, involving patients in care planning, and encouraging daily physical activity. Culturally tailored education, improved healthcare access, and patient-centred interventions are vital for enhancing self-care among South Asians. As this population's presence in Western countries increases, broader participation in self-care programmes can promote better integration and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41264097What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.