ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025
The role of cognitive impairments in patients' return to work and quality of working life after treatment of breast or gynecologic cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe examined the impact of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) after systemic or radiation therapy for breast or gynaecologic cancer on return to work (RTW) and quality of working life (QWL).
methodsThe analyses included 147 women diagnosed with breast or gynecologic cancer from the CogniFiT study who were 18-65 years old and employed at diagnosis. We assessed objective cognitive function (visual search, executive function, and verbal memory), subjective cognitive function (FACT-Cog), and other patient-reported outcomes before primary systemic or radiation therapy (T0), at the end of it (T1), and 1 year later (T2). Patients reported on RTW until T2 and, if applicable, QWL (QWLQ-CS). Logistic regressions on RTW and multiple regressions on QWL were calculated separately for each cognitive variable and patient-reported outcome and were adjusted for education, age, marital status, and chemotherapy.
resultsAt T2, 77.6% of patients had returned to work. Higher impairments in executive function, i.e., working memory (OR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.23-0.80]) and task-switching ability (OR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.25-0.82]) at T1, were associated with a lower likelihood for RTW at T2. Subjective cognitive impairments were not associated with RTW, but with lower QWL (β = - 0.35, 95% CI [- 0.53 to - 0.16]). Other patient-reported outcomes also showed no associations with RTW but were associated with QWL.
conclusionsDeficits in executive function, but not other domains, may hinder return to work. Subjective and objective measures of cognition relate to work outcomes differently. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Clinicians should openly address cognitive impairments as affected survivors may need additional support and workplace adaptations when returning to work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41264206What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.