Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264584›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Integrated knowledge translation (iKT) in preclinical research: A scoping review protocol.

Georgia Black, Reena Besa, Daniel Blumberger, Heather Brooks, Graham Collingridge, John Georgiou, Evelyn K Lambe, Clement Ma, Bernadette Mdawar, Tarek K Rajji and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Georgia BlackCommunity Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Reena BesaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel BlumbergerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Heather BrooksCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Graham CollingridgeDepartment of Physiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9572-5359
John GeorgiouLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-6384
Evelyn K LambeDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-6090
Clement MaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bernadette MdawarCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tarek K RajjiCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-2560
Sanjeev SockalingamCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cara SullivanLived Experience Consultant, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quincy VazCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zhengbang YaoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Branka AgicCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-1296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegrated knowledge translation (iKT) is a collaborative research approach that emphasizes the meaningful and active participation of knowledge users throughout the research process. Evidence suggests that integrated knowledge translation has the potential to increase the relevance, applicability, and use of research findings. This approach has been increasingly utilized in health research in recent years. However, the extent to which it has been applied in preclinical research and its effectiveness are unknown. To address this gap, we will conduct a scoping review to map the current use, potential benefits, and challenges of iKT in preclinical research.

methodsGuided by a modified Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, we will systematically search reference lists and key research databases including Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed articles written or translated in English that focus on iKT or approaches that align with iKT within the context of preclinical research will be included. This review will be conducted as part of the Improving Neuroplasticity through Spaced Prefrontal intermittent-Theta-Beta-Stimulation REfinement in Depression (INSPiRE-D) project, which features preclinical research from mouse models to human work (Grant number CAMH File No.22-060). The project's multidisciplinary team and knowledge user advisory committee will be consulted at key points throughout the scoping review process. A person with lived experience co-chairs the project advisory committee, co-authored this manuscript, and will be routinely included in the decision-making process of the scoping review.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41264584
PMCPMC12633911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.