ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Enhancing birth weight outcomes through improved antenatal care in West African countries: Evidence from propensity score matching analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While many underlying causes of low birth weight (LBW, < 2500 grams) are preventable through overall antenatal care (ANC) uptake, limited empirical evidence exists in West Africa quantifying the impact of the WHO-recommended four or more visits (ANC4+) and eight or more visits (ANC8+) models using rigorous causal inference techniques. Thus, this study aimed to examine the causal effect of those two models on birth weight outcomes in West African countries using propensity score matching (PSM). This study included a weighted sample of 51,455 women sourced from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 14 West African countries (2012-2023). Covariates associated with treatments (ANC4+ and ANC8+) and birth weight were identified using Chi-square tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t-tests, and those deemed confounders were included in PSM. PSM was applied using a logit model to estimate the causal effects of ANC4+ and ANC8+ on birthweight. Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) and Average Treatment Effect (ATE) were calculated for each exposure. Quality of matching was assessed both statistically and graphically. Sensitivity analysis was done using Rosenbaum bounds to estimate unmeasured confounding and confirm the robustness of treatment effects. The mean birthweight was 3121.2 grams (±669.0), with 10.42% of newborns classified as LBW. Receiving ANC8+ and ANC4 + were associated with a birthweight increase of 102.36 and 83.89 grams, respectively. Across the entire population, ANC8+ and ANC4 + were linked to average birthweight increases of 89.09 and 75.81 grams, respectively. Of the weighted sample, 71.38% and 14.54% of women received ANC4+ and ANC8 + , respectively. All matching diagnostics demonstrated strong covariate balance and confirmed the validity of the treatment effect estimates. The treatment and control groups were well comparable for the baseline confounders after matching (p-value > 0.05). This study found that receiving ANC4+ or ANC8 + has a positive effect on birth weight, underscoring the importance of scaling up efforts to ensure comprehensive ANC coverage, especially ANC8 + , in the region to reduce LBW prevalence and improve neonatal survival.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.