ArticleDementia (London, England)2026
The Importance of a Relationship-Centred Approach to Deprescribing for People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Dementia (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Importance of a Relationship-Centred Approach to Deprescribing for People with Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Dementia (London, England) · 2026Article
- Latent class patterns of medication attitudes and their correlates among older adults in the United States.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polypharmacy (taking five or more regular medications) is common in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and is associated with poor outcomes such as decline in cognitive and physical functioning, falls and hospital admission. Reducing or stopping unnecessary medications (deprescribing) can help improve outcomes but limited research has been undertaken with people with dementia or MCI, especially in primary care. This study explored the perspectives and experiences of people with dementia or MCI, informal carers and healthcare professionals on deprescribing decision-making in this setting. Seven people with dementia, two people with MCI and nine informal carers took part in photo elicitation and an in-person interview. They took photographs of their day-to-day management of medication, which were used during the interview to probe the conversation. Sixteen healthcare professionals, including general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, social prescribers and National Health Service memory clinic professionals, participated in individual online interviews. Data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings suggest the need to navigate 'patient vs carer vs professional voices' in the deprescribing process to ensure everyone's voice is included. It should take into account patient cognitive abilities, autonomy and independence, as well as carer experiences and the need for a written summary of what has been discussed and agreed. Flexible, tailored, cross-system medication management processes are needed to support effective deprescribing, including proactive follow-up. To facilitate deprescribing discussions, factors such as professional knowledge, safe environment, and sufficient time should be considered. Finally, careful consideration should be given to the potential impact of deprescribing decisions on day-to-day medication management and carer burden. These findings provide novel insights that demonstrate the need for a relationship-centred approach for deprescribing for people with dementia or MCI, which should inform future research on development of a primary care deprescribing intervention for this group of people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.