Trial reportHepatology communications2025
Group-based telehealth stress management-lifestyle interventions are feasible for patients with chronic liver disease.
Trial report in Hepatology communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGroup-based, telehealth behavioral interventions may be efficient, effective, and acceptable treatment modalities for patients with chronic liver diseases; however, pilot feasibility and patient satisfaction data are needed to justify efficacy trials. Given the poor quality of life, symptoms, and health risk factors, patients with chronic hepatitis C-associated liver disease (HCV-LD) may benefit from psychosocial interventions. A pilot feasibility study of a videoconferencing-delivered cognitive behavioral coping skills intervention ("VC-CBCS") was conducted to evaluate multiple indicators of feasibility, levels of patient satisfaction, and changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
methodsWe pilot tested a 14-week, 90-minute VC-CBCS intervention by conducting a small randomized controlled trial. Thirty-two adults with HCV-LD and high stress/symptom levels were randomized to the protocolized VC-CBCS intervention (n=24) or standard of care (n=8), in 4 waves of 7-9 participants in 2020-2021.
resultsBased upon rates of approach to enrollment (60%), retention (84%), PRO data collection (99.4%), and session attendance (91%), a future efficacy trial appears highly feasible. Levels of participant satisfaction were encouraging for VC delivery, intervention content and structure, and group processes. Technological and behavioral issues were minor. Collection of in-home saliva testing was not feasible. Moderate to large pre-post-intervention effect sizes were observed for some mediators (perceived stress, coping, relaxation, self-efficacy, sleep hygiene), with some of these changes correlating with small to moderate improvements in mental health and symptoms (eg, depression, fatigue; effect size range: 0.23-0.47). No consistent patterns were evident between changes in eating and exercise behaviors and PROs.
conclusionsA group-based VC-CBCS intervention appears feasible and may address unmet psychosocial needs in patients living with chronic liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.