ArticleAnimal bioscience2026
Distillers' grains as alternative feed resources for beef cattle: review.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of carcass traits and pricing in crossbred beef cattle under a cooperative production system in tropical Thailand.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Distillers' Grains-Derived Bioactive Fraction Suppresses Colorectal Cancer Progression Through Modulation of Autophagy-Associated PI3K/AKT Signaling.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distillers' grains (DG), including wet, dried, and dried with solubles, are valuable co-products for beef cattle feeding due to their high digestible energy, rumen-undegradable protein, and functional fiber content. This review integrates current knowledge of the nutritional, productive, environmental, and economic implications of DG use in feedlot systems across temperate and tropical regions. At moderate inclusion levels (15%-30% of dietary dry matter), DG consistently enhances feed efficiency and reduces feeding costs without compromising growth performance or carcass traits. Their low starch concentration contributes to more stable ruminal fermentation and a lower risk of subacute acidosis compared with high-grain diets. Nevertheless, excessive ether extract and sulfur concentrations may depress fiber digestibility and increase the incidence of metabolic disorders such as polioencephalomalacia when diets are improperly formulated. Environmentally, DG improves resource efficiency by recycling ethanol co-products and reducing reliance on conventional feed grains; however, their high nitrogen and phosphorus contents can elevate nutrient excretion and potential environmental load if not properly managed. Economically, DG enhances profitability for feedlots located near ethanol plants, though market volatility and transportation costs remain key constraints. Recent advances in coproduct processing and fractionation have mitigated several nutritional limitations, broadening the applicability of DG in precision feeding programs. Future progress will rely on refining nutrient characterization, optimizing phase-specific inclusion, and integrating DG within sustainable beef production frameworks. When strategically incorporated, DG serve as efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally responsible ingredients for modern beef production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.