ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Nutritional Health Care Information System.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malnutrition remains a critical global health challenge among hospitalized patients, necessitating effective nutrition support systems.This study aims to construct and evaluate a cross-professional, cross-sectoral nutrition health care information system (CPCS-NHIS) to optimize clinical nutrition management.The system integrates modified medical systems to unify information flows, knowledge, and clinical roles. In addition, a 20-item across six dimensions electronic questionnaire based on the revised DeLone and McLean IS Success model was developed to evaluate the success of the CSCP-NHIS. Besides, user satisfaction was assessed as a key dimension using a 5-point Likert's scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Finally, the results of the questionnaire were further validated by reliability and validity analysis.The CPCS-NHIS features comprehensive functions including bedside nutritional screening, assessment, intervention, diagnosis, monitoring, enteral nutrition prescription, and QR-code autopayment. Over 80% of users expressed willingness to continue using and recommending the system. The questionnaire results demonstrated strong psychometric properties: all Cronbach's α coefficients >0.80, confirmed reliability; confirmatory factor analysis showed convergent validity (the average variance extracted >0.50, construct reliability >0.80); and model fit indices were excellent, with a chi-square value of 1.86, a root mean squared error of approximation of 0.09, a root mean square residual of 0.02, and a comparative fit index of 0.9.The CPCS-NHIS provides a practical framework for existing nutritional health care information systems, based on the nutrition care process and model, with robust psychometric evidence and high user acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.