ArticleNature communications2025
Boosting reservoir computing with brain-inspired adaptive control of E-I balance.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Synchronization-Driven Learning Rule for Pattern Separation in Self-Organizing Probabilistic Spiking Neural Networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Entropy, Inhibition and Memory in Balanced Spiking Reservoirs.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Attractor dynamics of a whole-cortex network model predicts emergence and structure of fMRI co-activation patterns in the mouse brain.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Neuromorphic Robustness via Recurrence Resonance: The Role of Shared Weak Attractors in Quantum Logic Networks.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reservoir computers (RCs) are a class of recurrent neural networks that incorporate brain-inspired principles and provide an efficient alternative to deep learning. With fixed random internal connections and trained output weights, they simplify learning but remain sensitive to hyperparameters governing activation and connectivity. While various hyperparameters are commonly tuned, the relative balance between excitatory and inhibitory (E-I) signals-fundamental to brain function-is typically fixed in RCs. Here, we investigate tuning this balance and show that strong performance consistently arises in balanced or slightly over-inhibited regimes, not excitation-dominated ones. Further, we introduce a self-adapting mechanism that locally adjusts E-I balance to achieve target firing rates, reducing hyperparameter tuning costs and yielding up to 130% performance gains in memory capacity and time-series prediction. Incorporating heterogeneity in firing-rate targets further enhances robustness. These findings highlight dynamic adaptation as a promising design principle, improving RC performance while offering insights into neural computation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.