Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266387›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning and whole-brain networks for biomarker discovery: modeling the dynamics of brain fluctuations in resting-state and cognitive tasks.

Facundo Roffet, Gustavo Deco, Claudio Delrieux, Gustavo Patow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Facundo RoffetElectric and Computer Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Gustavo DecoCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudio DelrieuxElectric and Computer Engineering Department, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Gustavo PatowCenter for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. gustavo.patow@udg.edu.

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2021 SGR 00917Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2021 SGR 01035European Research Council 101071900Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2021-122136OB-C22Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2022-136216NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain network models offer insights into brain dynamics, but the utility of model-derived bifurcation parameters as biomarkers remains underexplored. This study evaluates bifurcation parameters from a whole-brain network model as biomarkers for distinguishing brain states associated with resting-state and task-based cognitive conditions. Synthetic BOLD signals were generated using a supercritical Hopf brain network model to train deep learning models for bifurcation parameter prediction. Inference was performed on Human Connectome Project data, including both resting-state and task-based conditions. Statistical analyses assessed the separability of brain states based on bifurcation parameter distributions. Bifurcation parameter distributions differed significantly across task and resting-state conditions ([Formula: see text] for all but two comparisons). Task-based brain states exhibited higher bifurcation values compared to rest. At the individual level, a machine learning model was able to classify the predicted bifurcation values into eight cohorts with 62.63% accuracy (well above the 12.50% chance level). Bifurcation parameters effectively differentiate cognitive and resting states, warranting further investigation as biomarkers for brain state characterization and neurological disorder assessment.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionDeep LearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetRestAdultBiomarkersConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41266387
PMCPMC12635380

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.