Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on emotional instability and impulsivity in atypical depression and bipolar II disorder.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical depressive disorder and bipolar disorder often present with symptoms like emotional instability and impulsive behaviors. Various treatments, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological, are employed to manage these conditions. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a modern treatment option that has shown promise with minimal side effects. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of tDCS on emotional instability and impulsivity in individuals with atypical depression and bipolar type II. This study utilized a semi-experimental, pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The participants were patients diagnosed with atypical and bipolar depression, all of whom were referred from the neuropsychiatric clinic at Sina Hospital in Hamedan, Iran. Two hundred instability and impulsivity questionnaires were distributed among the patients using a purposeful sampling method. From these, participants were randomly assigned into four groups of 20 individuals each. The research tools included transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), delivered in ten consecutive sessions (30 min each, 2 mA) with the anode at F3 and the cathode at F4; the sham condition used the same montage with current discontinued after 30 s to ensure blinding., the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) by Eysenck and Sybil, and Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). Data analysis using covariance and multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) revealed a significant difference in emotional instability and impulsivity scores between the experimental and control groups for individuals with atypical depression and bipolar type II. Direct current electrical brain stimulation was found to reduce emotional instability in these groups, leading to improved emotional stability and reduced impulsivity in people with atypical depression and bipolar disorder. The results of this study confirm the potential of direct current electrical brain stimulation in reducing emotional instability and impulsivity in individuals with atypical depression. The emergence of tDCS as a promising non-pharmacological treatment option for managing these symptoms in people with both atypical depression and bipolar disorder type II is reassuring. This method modulates the prefrontal cortex's activity, a brain region crucial for planning, decision-making, and emotional regulation. The significant potential of tDCS as a non-pharmacological intervention for atypical depression and bipolar disorder type II is a positive sign for the future. However, further research is necessary to fully realize its benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.