Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266596›Full record

ReviewOncogene2025

From concept to clinic: a roadmap for DNA methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsies.

Heidi Pharo, Hege Marie Vedeld, Ingrid Vikan Sjurgard, Rita Pinto, Guro Elisabeth Lind

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Epigenetic Signatures in Hypospadias: Systematic Review.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heidi Pharo *Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-7091
Hege Marie Vedeld *Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Vikan SjurgardDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0009-0005-9553-7824
Rita PintoDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Guro Elisabeth LindDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway. guroli@uio.no.ORCID 0000-0003-4643-9345

Funding

Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) 216129Kreftforeningen (Norwegian Cancer Society) 223073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global cancer incidence continues to rise, emphasizing the urgent need for improved diagnostics and management strategies. DNA methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsies offer a promising, minimally invasive solution. Despite their potential, only a few tests have successfully transitioned from research to clinical practice. This review addresses key aspects influencing successful biomarker development and clinical implementation-including liquid biopsy source selection, biomarker discovery workflow and targeted validation in clinical sample series-and provide strategies to improve accuracy, reproducibility and clinical utility. Altogether, these considerations could aid in bridging the translational gap from research to clinical application, and to increase the number of clinically implemented liquid biopsy tests.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationNeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41266596
PMCPMC12657234

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.