Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41266656›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2026

Direct and indirect neurogenesis from radial glial progenitor cell clones in the mouse neocortex.

Dan Shen, Xin-Yi Wang, Ruo-Hang Liu, Huan-Huan Deng, Shi-Yuan Tong, Jun-Yang Chen, Zi-Yun Zhai, Yuan-Xin Li, You-Ning Lin, Fu-Wei Yang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dan ShenJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9756-1608
Xin-Yi WangJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5429-9853
Ruo-Hang LiuJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Huan-Huan DengJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Shi-Yuan TongJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Jun-Yang ChenJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-2620
Zi-Yun ZhaiJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Yuan-Xin LiJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
You-Ning LinJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Fu-Wei YangJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Chen-Xi WangJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Lin-Yun LiuJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. liuly@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-759X
Ying ZhuJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. ying_zhu@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-3734
Yong-Chun YuJing'an District Central Hospital of Shanghai, Institutes of Brain Science, State Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disorders, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. ycyu@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7456-7451

Funding

MOST | National Key Research and Development Program of China (NKPs) 2021ZD0202500MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31725012MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31930044MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 82071259STI2030 Major Projects 2021ZD0200100The Collaborative Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 2020CXJQ01The Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission 2019-0107-00-07-E00062The National Key Research and Development Project of China 2023YFF 1204802The Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size and complexity of the neocortex are largely determined during brain development by neurogenesis from radial glial progenitor (RGP) cells. Neurogenesis from such cells can be direct (i.e., RGP cells give rise directly to neurons) or indirect (i.e., RGP cells first produce intermediate progenitor cells, which then divide further to produce neurons). How direct and indirect neurogenesis from RGP cells leads to the appropriate neocortical size and cell-type composition remains incompletely understood. In this study, we developed a combined retrovirus- and FlashTag-based labeling technique that allows clonal tracking of sequential RGP divisions and identification of progeny identities in vivo. Using this method, we show that divisions of mouse RGP cells giving rise to neurogenic (N), neurogenic intermediate progenitor (IP), and neurogenic proliferative intermediate progenitor (IPP) cells tend to generate similar numbers of pyramidal neurons. In the early neuronal progeny of RGP cells, the distribution of neurons produced by the N-, IP-, and IPP-producing divisions follows an "inside-out" pattern in the neocortex. Clonal analysis and mathematical modeling indicate that RGP cells initially give rise to neurons, IP, and IPP cells in a stochastic manner, followed by relatively stable transition patterns between direct and indirect neurogenesis across successive generations. These findings provide a comprehensive and novel understanding of the dynamics of cell division during cortical neurogenesis.

Indexed as

Ependymoglial CellsNeocortexNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeurogliaStem CellsAnimalsClone CellsMiceNeuronsCell LineageIntermediate Progenitor CellNeocortexNeurogenesisRadial Glial Progenitor Cell

Identifiers

PMID41266656
PMCPMC12759082

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.