ArticleScientific reports2025
Early CMV DNAemia during letermovir prophylaxis predicts lower risk of late CMV infection and is associated with enhanced T-cell immunity after alloHSCT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative performance evaluation of the VIDAS cytomegalovirus (CMV) interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and T-SPOT CMV for measuring CMV-specific T-cell responses in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute leukemia patients: results of the LETreal study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CMV-specific immune monitoring may support individualized risk stratification after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT), but its role in the era of letermovir prophylaxis remains unclear. In this prospective single-center study, 45 CMV-seropositive alloHSCT recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis for 100 days post-transplant were followed for 12 months. CMV-specific T-cell responses to IE-1 and pp65 were assessed by IFN-γ ELISpot on days 100 and 200, and at the time of CMV infection and follow-up. Early CMV infection occurred in 18/45 patients (40%) during prophylaxis, of which 16 (88.9%) were transient "blips" and required no pre-emptive therapy. In univariate logistic regression, early CMV infection was associated a significantly lower risk of late CMV infection (p = 0.0044). IE-1-specific responses at day 100 were significantly higher in patients without late infection (median 27.5 vs. 5.0 SFC/250,000 PBMCs; p = 0.0056), and in those with early CMV infection (p = 0.0351). T-cell responses were already detectable at the time of CMV infection and remained stable thereafter. In conclusion, early abortive CMV DNAemia during letermovir prophylaxis appears to induces rapid and durable T-cell immunity. Immune monitoring may not be required in these patients, whereas ELISpot testing at day 100 may guide risk-adapted management in those without early CMV exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.