ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2025
Gaps in diagnosis and unmet healthcare needs in male sexual dysfunction and chronic health conditions: insights from a German population-based study.
Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic health conditions (CHC), both somatic and mental, increase the risk of sexual dysfunctions (SD) in men, which are associated with reduced quality of life. Despite existing guidelines, help-seeking remains low due to barriers such as shame and limited access, with many turning to anonymous sources. Representative data on care pathways and treatment preferences across SD domains and CHC subgroups is lacking. This study examines SD diagnoses, help-seeking, and treatment preferences in men with and without CHC meeting ICD-11 SD criteria to inform more tailored care.
resultsOf all N = 1815 (unweighted N = 1787) cis-men, n = 265 (16.6%) fulfilled positive ICD-11 SD criteria and were included in this study (mean age 49.2; SD = 16.9 years). CHC were present in 74.1% of men, of whom 23.2% had self-reported SD. While the internet remains the most used information source, urologists were the preferred information sources and dialogue partners for sexual health concerns. Men with mental health conditions (MH +) valued psychotherapists and psychiatrists more highly in this regard. Shame was the most cited barrier to help-seeking, particularly present in men with MH + , with 50.4%. Only 46.6% of men with SD symptoms meeting the ICD-11 criteria reported an SD diagnosis. Previous therapy was rare, with 3-4 months of waiting times. Medication was the most commonly used treatment in the past. As preferred treatment, men with CHC prioritized medication (42.6% vs. 36.7% in men without CHC), whereas men without CHC also favored relaxation methods (29.3%). Desired treatment goals included improved sexual and relationship satisfaction. Digital tools such as apps or websites were also of interest, with reimbursement considered essential.
conclusionDespite the high burden, SD diagnoses remain rare, and help-seeking behaviors vary, especially between men with somatic versus mental CHC. Regular healthcare contact may offer opportunities to address sexual health in trusted settings. Interventions should target both sexual and relationship satisfaction. Digital solutions can help close treatment gaps and improve access to specialized care. However, given low interest and adherence-particularly among men with CHC-tailored approaches are essential. Reimbursement within the German healthcare system is needed to lower financial barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.