ReviewChinese medicine2025
Computerized tongue image analysis for non-invasive disease screening: a review.
Review in Chinese medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tongue Image Analysis and Clinical Data Fusion: A Novel Approach for Non-invasive Diagnosis of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- Objective tongue phenotyping identifies phenotypic heterogeneity in diabetic kidney disease: a dual-center clustering analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Objective tongue phenotyping and nutritional risk in diabetic kidney disease: a dual-centre study linking quantified tongue features to the controlling nutritional status score.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Tongue Characteristics and Musculoskeletal Pain in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Principal Component and Latent Profile Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Toward dynamic tongue diagnosis: a conceptual framework for temporal phenotyping.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The association between tongue features and tongue coating microbiota and gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- A portable non-contact tongue imaging system with automated analysis for community and home settings.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The characteristics of the tongue surface and sublingual vein patterns provide valuable insights into an individual's health status and have long served as the cornerstone of traditional tongue diagnosis. As a non-invasive digital biomarker, tongue imaging has recently gained attention as a promising modality for capturing internal physiological and pathological variations, with the potential to support remote healthcare delivery and continuous health monitoring. Nevertheless, conventional practice remains highly dependent on subjective clinical judgment, which often introduces variability in diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making. To mitigate these limitations, computerized tongue image analysis (CTIA) has been developed to enhance objectivity, reproducibility, and consistency. This review proposes a structured taxonomy of CTIA, encompassing the essential stages of image acquisition, preprocessing, dataset construction, feature extraction, and disease detection. By systematically synthesizing advances across these stages, we delineate key challenges and outline potential solutions, particularly regarding data standardization and feature quantification. The taxonomy is intended to provide a coherent framework that may contribute to improving diagnostic precision and reliability, thereby informing the gradual clinical integration of tongue imaging as a supportive tool for non-invasive disease screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.