ArticleBiophysical journal2026
The influence of intercalated disk nanostructure on local ionic currents and cardiac conduction.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The intercalated disk (ID) is a structurally heterogeneous junctional complex essential for synchronized cardiac conduction and contraction. Previous computational models have investigated the influence of ID structure on cardiac conduction. However, most have relied on oversimplified geometries and uniformly distributed ion channels, limiting their ability to capture nanoscale heterogeneity. In this study, we expand our previous finite element mesh framework to produce a more physiologically realistic representation of the ID, incorporating spatially heterogeneous gap junctions and multiple ion and ionic current dynamics. We systematically quantify the impact of key structural and electrophysiological features on conduction by generating a comprehensive library of 384 ID mesh configurations and simulating tissue-level conduction for both strong and reduced gap junctional coupling. Further, we employed a multilayer perceptron neural network approach to quantify gradient-based sensitivity analysis, enabling a systematic quantification of the relative influence of geometric and nanostructural factors on ID and cleft dynamics, as well as tissue-level conduction across multiple regimes. In particular, sensitivity analysis revealed that gap junctional coupling, cleft geometry, and nanostructure heterogeneity are the dominant determinants of cleft potential, sodium current synchronization, and conduction velocity. We identify that membrane separation of the ID interplicate and plicate regions can exhibit context-dependent influences on conduction, either enhancing or slowing, depending on gap junctional coupling. Collectively, these findings highlight the regime-dependent roles of ID ultrastructure and establish a quantitative framework that links nanoscale ID morphology to tissue-scale cardiac conduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.