ArticleJournal of global health2025
Evaluating community resilience through social media during China's first post-COVID-19 reopening: insights from machine learning.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the face of pandemics from infectious diseases, enhancing community resilience is increasingly important. It is, therefore, essential to evaluate community resilience and identify factors that can strengthen it. This study aimed to evaluate community resilience by leveraging a data set comprising user information from Weibo and applying interpretable machine learning (ML) techniques to identify the contributions of various indicators underpinning community resilience. Methods: This cross-sectional study analysed social media data from December 2022 to January 2023. COVID-19-related user interactions were examined as indicators of community resilience within the context of community response. This study introduced an evaluation framework comprising thirteen indicators. It also described the application of natural language processing (NLP) techniques, the K-means (KM) clustering, a random forest (RF) classifier and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to achieve its objectives. Results: A total of 177 000 Weibo posts were collected for this study. The NLP model demonstrated strong performance in accurately labelling posts, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8862 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8600-0.9102) and accuracy (ACC) of 0.8939 (95% CI = 0.8563-0.9277). This study identified four distinct community resilience levels: low (77.64%), medium-low (9.86%), medium-high (10.55%), and high (1.95%). Further analyses revealed clear regional disparities in community resilience, with higher levels observed in Eastern China. The top five indicators associated with community resilience, as determined by mean SHAP values, were 'Efficacy of performance altruistic response' (0.0101), 'Tangible aid engagement' (0.0051), 'Rapid performance of altruism' (0.0044), 'Sentiment response associated with recording positive posts' (0.0036), and 'Help-seeking response efficacy' (0.0035). Conclusions: This study is the first to harness social media data to quantify community resilience in mainland China. Five indicators associated with enhanced community resilience are identified as potential predictors that can inform governmental strategies and strengthen decision-making support for improving health emergency responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.