ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A machine learning approach to predict postoperative sleep disturbance after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of multiple algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Who Is the Surgeon Now: Human Hands or Machine Minds? Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics from Diagnosis to Follow-Up-A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) is a common complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which negatively impacts patient recovery. Despite the critical need for early detection and management, there is limited research on predictive models for early PSD, particularly those integrating machine learning (ML) techniques. Objective: This study aimed to develop a predictive model for early PSD following TKA using ML algorithms, identify key predictive factors, and provide an interpretable model to guide clinical decision-making. Methods: The study included 505 patients who underwent TKA. Clinical data were collected at three stages: preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Ten MLa models, including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost, were trained and evaluated using a test set. Performance metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were used to evaluate the efficacy of the models. Key features influencing PSD were identified through SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model interpretability. Results: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) demonstrated the highest AUC (0.906), accuracy (0.834), and sensitivity (0.879), establishing it as the optimal model for predicting PSD. Key predictors identified included age, smoking, living alone, living in the city, VAS 1 month postoperative, and anxiety 1 month postoperative. SHAP analysis revealed that postoperative VAS and age were the most influential factors in predicting PSD, with their impact varying based on individual patient data. Conclusion: The study developed a robust and interpretable ML model for the early prediction of PSD following TKA. This model can aid in preoperative risk stratification, facilitating personalized management strategies to improve postoperative outcomes. Further validation in larger cohorts and diverse settings is necessary to enhance its broader clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.