ReviewMedComm2025
Obesity Paradox in Cancer: A Complex Interplay Between Risk and Therapeutic Outcomes.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prognostic analysis and beneficiary population exploration of subsequent treatment regimens after third-generation EGFR-TKIs failure in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Understanding the mechanisms underlying obesity induced tumorigenesis: therapeutic perspectives to manage dysregulated lipid metabolism.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Immune Escape in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Latest Research and Treatment Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Development of a Prognostic Model for Oral Cancer by Incorporating Novel Nodal Parameters Beyond Conventional TNM Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a recognized risk factor for cancer development and progression. Paradoxically, growing clinical evidence across several cancer types indicates that elevated body mass index (BMI) or specific body composition characteristics-such as increased visceral fat or preserved skeletal muscle-may be associated with moderately improved overall survival in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This seemingly contradictory phenomenon is often described as the "obesity paradox." In this review, we delineate the etiological versus therapeutic implications of obesity, synthesizing data from non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Proposed explanations include low-grade inflammation with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-mediated programmed death-1 upregulation, insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling, adipokine imbalance, stromal fibrosis and hypoxia, and metabolic reprogramming that may alter T-cell function and tumor immunogenicity. Nonbiological factors-including dosing strategies, sarcopenia, and sex-specific differences-are also examined. We advocate for future research employing comprehensive body composition assessments, standardized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses, and consideration of sex and metabolic health. Clarifying the temporal and mechanistic basis of the obesity-ICI benefit relationship will inform the optimization of cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.