Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41267936›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Genomics in plant pathogen identification and control.

Nkechi Gloria Ogbuji, Josephine Udunma Agogbua

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nkechi Gloria OgbujiDepartment of Plant Science and Biotechnology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
Josephine Udunma AgogbuaDepartment of Plant Science and Biotechnology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics have revolutionized plant pathogen detection and control by enabling faster and more accurate identification compared to traditional culture-based methods. Genomic tools like metagenomics and next generation sequencing (NGS) facilitate the detection of microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes) directly from environmental samples. Genomics also provides information on plant-pathogen interactions, especially the detection of Resistance (R) genes and their role in plant defense against pathogens, aiding in the development of genetic markers for breeding disease-resistance crop species. Gene editing systems such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and Zinc Finger nucleases (ZFNs) allow for precise genetic modification, either by incorporating a beneficial R genes or disabling susceptibility (S) genes of the host plant. RNA interference (RNAi) is another genomic tool used to suppress important pathogenic genes and inhibit disease development. Although the use of genomics in plant pathology is hampered by limitations such as high costs, complexity of data analysis and interpretation, and limited access to sequencing platforms, especially in developing countries, recent innovations and multi-disciplinary collaborations are tackling these issues. In general, genomics offers powerful tools that can be employed in the development of sustainable and effective plant disease management strategies, which will help to enhance crop protection and contribute to global food security.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9disease-resistant cropsgenomic technologiesmetagenomicsNGSplant-pathogen interactionRNAisustainable plant protection

Identifiers

PMID41267936
PMCPMC12626969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.