ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Prognostic value of the GRANT score and development of a nomogram in papillary renal cell carcinoma: a SEER-based study with external validation in a Chinese cohort.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) exhibits significant heterogeneity, and robust prognostic tools specifically validated for this subtype are lacking. The GRANT score, incorporating grade, age, nodes, and tumor stage, shows promise but requires extensive validation in pRCC-specific cohorts. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the GRANT score and develop a novel nomogram for predicting survival in pRCC patients. Methods: A multi-center retrospective study was conducted. Patients undergoing surgery for pRCC were identified from the SEER database (2004-2015) and formed the training (n=4,001) and internal validation (n=1,689) cohorts. An external validation cohort (n=151) was sourced from a Chinese institution. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were primary endpoints. The GRANT score was calculated for all patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses identified independent prognostic factors, which were incorporated into nomograms for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration plots. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed the GRANT score as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and CSS. The prognostic nomograms integrated key variables, including surgical approach, marital status, TNM stage, tumor size, Fuhrman grade, and the GRANT score. For OS prediction, the nomogram achieved C-indices of 0.711 (training), 0.720 (internal validation), and 0.740 (external validation). For CSS prediction, the model demonstrated superior performance, with C-indices of 0.860 (training), 0.873 (internal validation), and 0.826 (external validation). Calibration curves showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Risk stratification based on nomogram scores effectively distinguished low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patient groups with significantly different survival. Conclusion: This study validates the GRANT score as an independent prognostic factor in a large pRCC cohort. The developed and externally validated nomogram provides a clinically useful tool with robust performance, particularly for predicting CSS, facilitating personalized risk assessment and postoperative management for pRCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.