ReviewBioactive materials2025
Preclinical research models for evaluating the biocompatibility of bioresorbable metallic cardiovascular stents: A comparative review.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A terminator-inspired liquid metal stent for treating atherosclerotic vascular stenosis with precise vascular matching and magnetothermally regulated active degradation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Optimization of Magnetic Abrasive Finishing Parameters for Co-Cr Alloy Vascular Stent Tubing Using PSO-SVM.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular stents are widely used to treat atherosclerosis by relieving vascular obstruction and providing structural support after coronary angioplasty. Bioresorbable metallic stents represent a promising alternative to conventional corrosion-resistant stents, which are linked to late-stage complications such as in-stent restenosis and thrombosis. Due to the diversity of stent materials and designs, rigorous evaluation of their interactions with the vascular environment in relevant preclinical models is essential before clinical translation. However, current studies employ highly variable in vitro cell systems, in vivo animal models, and experimental assays to assess biocompatibility, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about candidate designs. This review outlines the current landscape of bioresorbable metallic stents, critically examines the strengths and limitations of preclinical models described in the literature and in international guidelines, and provides recommendations to guide future research in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.