Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268413›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Detecting environmental barriers affecting older adult pedestrians via Gramian angular field-based CNN of smartphone sensor data.

Sungkook Hong, Hyunsoo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sungkook HongDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Hyunsoo KimDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Promoting safe walking among older adults requires precise identification of environmental barriers that disrupt gait. Traditional adult- and survey-based walkability assessments are labor-intensive and often miss transient hazards, while prior wearable-sensor methods-threshold-based acceleration, Maximum Lyapunov Exponent (MaxLE, a gait-stability index quantifying the local divergence of gait dynamics), and information entropy-either lack individual sensitivity or depend on aggregated data. This study introduces a framework that converts smartphone IMU time-series into Gramian Angular Field (GAF) images for classification by a lightweight CNN. Methods: Twenty older adults completed walking trials along a 1.2 km urban route featuring common barriers (uneven sidewalks, curb drops, narrow alleys, driveway crossings). IMU data were filtered, segmented into 2-s windows, transformed into 200 × 200-pixel GAF images, and evaluated under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Results: Among three benchmarks-peak-acceleration threshold, MaxLE (82.3% accuracy, F1-score = 0.45), and multi-user entropy-the GAF-CNN achieved 90.8% accuracy, 93.0% sensitivity, and 88.1% specificity, significantly outperforming the baselines (75-85% accuracy). Spatial mapping confirmed close correspondence between detected anomalies and true barrier locations. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that image-based deep learning provides a practical and interpretable solution for real-time, personalized detection of environmental barriers, offering a scalable tool for data-driven walkability enhancement in age-friendly urban design.

Indexed as

Environment DesignPedestriansSmartphoneWalkingAgedFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle Agedconvolutional neural network (CNN)environmental barriersGramian Angular Field (GAF)older adult gait analysiswearable sensor walkability monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41268413
PMCPMC12626866

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.