Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41268588›Full record

ArticleJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)2025

Aida Mehdipour, Roohollah Fateh, Zeinab Naseri, Mohammad Aghaali, Ali Saleh, Faezeh Kabiri, Alireza Rasouli

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aida MehdipourCellular and Molecular Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Roohollah FatehCellular and Molecular Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Zeinab NaseriStudent Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Mohammad AghaaliDept. of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Ali SalehStudent Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Faezeh KabiriDept. of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.
Alireza RasouliDept. of Microbiology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Root canal treatment is one of the most critical dental treatments that help to maintain teeth. However, the growth of microorganisms leads to treatment failure. Considering the widespread use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in endodontic treatment, Purpose: This study aimed to investigate and compare the antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-adhesion properties of three types of MTA, including A.G.M MTA (Andishe Gostar Masud, Tehran, Iran), Ortho MTA (BioMTA, South Korea), and Ultradent™ MTA Flow (Ultradent MTA Flow, USA). Materials and Method: In this laboratory study, the antibacterial activity of three MTA substances against the strain of Results: Ortho MTA, A.G.M MTA, and MTA Flow showed intense antibacterial activity. The difference in the antibacterial effect of the three types of MTA was not statistically significant in all periods ( Conclusion: A.G.M MTA showed the highest antibacterial activity, and Ultradent MTA Flow and Ortho MTA showed stronger antifungal activity than A.G.M MTA. The highest anti-bacterial property was related to A.G.M MTA.

Indexed as

Candida albicansEndodonticEnterococcus faecalisMineral trioxide aggregate

Identifiers

PMID41268588
PMCPMC12627950

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.