ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Retinal Image Translation to Improve Glaucoma Screening With Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to improve automated glaucoma detection by utilizing generative adversarial networks (GANs) to translate underutilized scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) fundus images into synthetic color fundus (CF) photographs. Methods: A Cycle-Consistent GAN model (CycleGAN) framework was used to translate 16,936 SLO fundus photographs into corresponding synthetic CF images. Five deep learning models were trained using real CF, synthetic CF, SLO fundus, and combined datasets to classify glaucoma from a holdout test set of real CF photographs. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) and sensitivity at 90% and 95% specificities. Results: The "GAN+CFP" model, trained on real and synthetic CF images, achieved the highest AUC (0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93-0.96, P < 0.05) and sensitivity at 90% and 95% specificities (0.83 and 0.77, respectively), outperforming the "CFP" (AUC = 0.89, sensitivities = 0.77 and 0.66), "SLO+CFP" (AUC = 0.88, sensitivities = 0.71 and 0.56), and "GAN" models (AUC = 0.82, sensitivities = 0.51 and 0.33). The "GAN+CFP" and "SLO+CFP" models demonstrated consistent sensitivity across racial and ethnic groups, with "GAN+CFP" yielding superior results across demographics. Conclusions: GANs effectively translate SLO images into synthetic CF photographs, addressing domain shifts and increasing dataset sizes to enhance glaucoma detection. Translational Relevance: GANs may improve glaucoma classification models by improving dataset consistency and mitigating domain shifts. By generating synthetic CF images from SLO data, GANs expand available training data in a clinically relevant imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.